WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

Volume 40 Issue 3
Nov.  2019
Article Contents
Turn off MathJax

ZHENG Yong, SI Shun-jiang, BEI Pegfei, ZHAO Run, CHEN Xiu-ming. Effects of Strip Clear-cutting on the Growth and Yield of Bambusa rigida in Southern Sichuan[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 40(3): 51-56,76. doi: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2019.03.010
Citation: ZHENG Yong, SI Shun-jiang, BEI Pegfei, ZHAO Run, CHEN Xiu-ming. Effects of Strip Clear-cutting on the Growth and Yield of Bambusa rigida in Southern Sichuan[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 40(3): 51-56,76. doi: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2019.03.010

Effects of Strip Clear-cutting on the Growth and Yield of Bambusa rigida in Southern Sichuan


doi: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2019.03.010
More Information
  • Received Date: 2019-03-09
  • Bambusa rigida in Changning County was taken as the research object,the clear cutting belts were set in lengths of 60 m and widths of 3 m,6 m and 9 m.in the sample plots of Longtou Town and Zhuhai Town.The reserved zone was set between 3 m~6 m and 6 m~9 m cutting belt.The retention band had a retention bandwidth of 6 m;in addition,a 6×60 control zone was placed near the sample plot.After one year of mechanical strip clearing,the growth status,significant characteristics,and biomass (aboveground) were analyzed through investigation and data processing.The results showed that (1) the shoots were found in both plots,and the order of sprouting area size was 9m cutting belt > 6 m cutting belt > 3 m cutting belt.In Longtou town,the amount of shoots in each cutting belt and retaining belt was significantly higher than that in the control belt,and the maximum was 6 m~9 m retention belt,reaching 4 976±97 plants hm-2.In Zhuhai Town,the shoot number in the 3 m cutting belt,3 m~6 m retention zone and the 6 m~9 m zone were higher than that of the control zone,and the number of shoots in the 6 m~9 m retention zone was the highest,reaching 11 583 plants·hm-2.(2) One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons showed that the average breast diameter of bamboo shoots in Longtou Town and Zhuhai Town were not significantly different between the 6 m belt and the 9m belt (p>0.05),but the difference between each other belt were significant (p<0.05);the average height of bamboo shoots in Longtou town was not significantly different between the 3m belt and the 6m belt,or the 6m belt and the 9m belt (p>0.05),and the differences between the other belts were significant (p>0.05),the average height of bamboo shoots in Zhuhai Town was not significantly different from that of 6m harvesting belt and 9m harvesting belt (p>0.05),and the differences between the other belts were significant (p<0.05).(3) According to the exponential regression model and other fittings on the DBH and biomass,it could be calculated that after the strip-shaped clear cutting test,the yield of the 3 m~6 m retention zone and 6 m~9 m retention in Longtou town was 92.76% and 175.21% higher than that of the control.The yield of the 3 m~6 m retention zone and the 6 m~9 m retention zone in Zhuhai Town was 111.89% and 161.58% higher than that of the control.(4) Through the test,it was found that the 6 m~9 m retaining bamboo forest had the best growth,the highest biomass and the best transformation effect.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 曹明勇.长宁县竹林生物量及初级生产力特征研究[D].中南林业科技大学,2016.
    [2] 张鹏,唐森强,朱维双,等.淯江河岸缓冲带硬头黄竹人工林生物量及5种营养元素含量分配格局研究[J].西部林业科学,2010,39(02):27-31.
    [3] 耿伯介.中国植物志第九卷第一分册[M].北京:科学出版社,1996
    [4] 张瑞瑶.长宁县竹产业可持续发展研究[J].农村经济与科技,2017,28(6):44~45.
    [5] 康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等.马尾松人工林林分密度对林下植被及土壤性质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(10):2323~2331.
    [6] 王晓荣,刘学全,唐万鹏,等.丹江口湖北库区不同调控密度马尾松人工林林分特征[J].西南林业大学学报,2014,34(6):16~23.
    [7] 徐金良,毛玉明,郑成忠,等.抚育间伐对杉木人工林生长及出材量的影响[J].林业科学研究,2014,27(1):99~107.
    [8] 李春明,杜纪山,张会儒.抚育间伐对森林生长的影响及其模型研究[J].林业科学研究,2003(5):636~641.
    [9] 陈洪,简霁,杨东生,等.不同覆盖模式对毛竹林出笋的影响[J].四川林业科技,2019(1):43~47.
    [10] 刘雄,谌立贞,谭靖星,等.立竹密度对古蔺县方竹林笋产量的影响[J].四川林业科技,2018,39(6):40~43.
    [11] 吴雨峰,程晓玲,曹小军,等.不同林分结构对绵竹产量的影响研究[J].四川林业科技,2017,38(4):6~9.
    [12] 曹明勇,张峰,刘立斌.长宁县竹林生物量研究[J].绿色科技,2016,15:40~42.
    [13] 何亚平,费世民,蒋俊明,等.四川长宁竹林凋落物的蓄水功能研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(5):35~41.
    [14] 曹奕,曾永海,别鹏飞,等.四川省长宁县硬头黄竹生长状况研究[J].四川林业科技,2018,39(3):120~123

    +130.
    [15] 贾廷彬,张楠.丛生竹林调查方法初探[J].世界竹藤通讯,2016,14(4):25~29.
    [16] 武文定,董文渊,郑进宣.不同坡向和海拔对撑绿杂交竹生长的影响研究[J].世界竹藤通讯,2008,6(6):14~16.
    [17] 曹小军,李呈翔,魏素才,等.四川慈竹生长现状调查与分析[J].世界竹藤通讯,2009,7(6):24~28.
    [18] 张鹏,黄玲玲,张旭东,等.滩地硬头黄竹生物量结构及回归模型的研究[J].竹子研究汇刊,2009,28(3):25~28.
    [19] 郭宝华,范少辉,刘广路,等.不同施肥模式对硬头黄竹生长特征的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(7):45~49.
    [20] 谭宏超,谭汝强,张翼飞.3种皆伐方式对毛竹林更新生长的影响[J].世界竹藤通讯,2017,15(3):52~55.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(456) PDF downloads(18) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Effects of Strip Clear-cutting on the Growth and Yield of Bambusa rigida in Southern Sichuan

doi: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2019.03.010
  • School of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;Sichuan Yangtze River Ecological Landscape Construction Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610000, China;Mianyang Normal University, Mianyang 621000, China;Sichuan Academy of Forestry, Chengdu 610081, China;Sichuan Longmen Mountain Forest Ecosystem National positioning Observation and Research Station, Pingwu 622550, China

Abstract: Bambusa rigida in Changning County was taken as the research object,the clear cutting belts were set in lengths of 60 m and widths of 3 m,6 m and 9 m.in the sample plots of Longtou Town and Zhuhai Town.The reserved zone was set between 3 m~6 m and 6 m~9 m cutting belt.The retention band had a retention bandwidth of 6 m;in addition,a 6×60 control zone was placed near the sample plot.After one year of mechanical strip clearing,the growth status,significant characteristics,and biomass (aboveground) were analyzed through investigation and data processing.The results showed that (1) the shoots were found in both plots,and the order of sprouting area size was 9m cutting belt > 6 m cutting belt > 3 m cutting belt.In Longtou town,the amount of shoots in each cutting belt and retaining belt was significantly higher than that in the control belt,and the maximum was 6 m~9 m retention belt,reaching 4 976±97 plants hm-2.In Zhuhai Town,the shoot number in the 3 m cutting belt,3 m~6 m retention zone and the 6 m~9 m zone were higher than that of the control zone,and the number of shoots in the 6 m~9 m retention zone was the highest,reaching 11 583 plants·hm-2.(2) One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons showed that the average breast diameter of bamboo shoots in Longtou Town and Zhuhai Town were not significantly different between the 6 m belt and the 9m belt (p>0.05),but the difference between each other belt were significant (p<0.05);the average height of bamboo shoots in Longtou town was not significantly different between the 3m belt and the 6m belt,or the 6m belt and the 9m belt (p>0.05),and the differences between the other belts were significant (p>0.05),the average height of bamboo shoots in Zhuhai Town was not significantly different from that of 6m harvesting belt and 9m harvesting belt (p>0.05),and the differences between the other belts were significant (p<0.05).(3) According to the exponential regression model and other fittings on the DBH and biomass,it could be calculated that after the strip-shaped clear cutting test,the yield of the 3 m~6 m retention zone and 6 m~9 m retention in Longtou town was 92.76% and 175.21% higher than that of the control.The yield of the 3 m~6 m retention zone and the 6 m~9 m retention zone in Zhuhai Town was 111.89% and 161.58% higher than that of the control.(4) Through the test,it was found that the 6 m~9 m retaining bamboo forest had the best growth,the highest biomass and the best transformation effect.

Reference (20)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return