Effects of Drought Stress on Ecological Structure and Physiological Characteristics of Sand-control Plants

CHEN De-chao; ZOU Yu-he; YAN Wu-xian; DENG Dong-zhou; HE Li; WU Shi-lei; YU Ling-fan; YANG Jing-yu; ZHANG Li; DUAN Xue-mei; YAN Jin-yan

doi:10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2018.06.019

Volume 39 Issue 6

Nov. 2019

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology > 2018 > 39(6): 81-85

CHEN De-chao, ZOU Yu-he, YAN Wu-xian, DENG Dong-zhou, HE Li, WU Shi-lei, YU Ling-fan, YANG Jing-yu, ZHANG Li, DUAN Xue-mei, YAN Jin-yan. Effects of Drought Stress on Ecological Structure and Physiological Characteristics of Sand-control Plants[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2018, 39(6): 81-85. doi: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2018.06.019

Citation:

CHEN De-chao, ZOU Yu-he, YAN Wu-xian, DENG Dong-zhou, HE Li, WU Shi-lei, YU Ling-fan, YANG Jing-yu, ZHANG Li, DUAN Xue-mei, YAN Jin-yan. Effects of Drought Stress on Ecological Structure and Physiological Characteristics of Sand-control Plants[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2018, 39(6): 81-85. doi: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2018.06.019

Effects of Drought Stress on Ecological Structure and Physiological Characteristics of Sand-control Plants

doi: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2018.06.019

More Information

Sichuan Academic of Forestry, Chengdu 610081, China;Sichuan Aba Forestry Science and Technology Research Institute, Wenchuan 623000, China;Aba Vocational College, Wenchuan 623000, China

Received Date: 2018-09-03

Abstract

Biological control plays a dominant role in the process of controlling desertification. The sand-control plants will gradually form the morphological structure and physiological characteristics adaptating to drought under the harsh environment of drought, strong sunshine, poor soil, large wind and sand, low temperature and so on. Morphological structure and physiological characteristics will be elaborated for plant screening.
- Desertification control;
- Sand-control plants;
- Morphological structure;
- Physiological characteristics;
- Plant screening

References

[1]	王涛.中国沙漠与沙漠化[M].石家庄:河北科学技术出版社,1997.
[2]	慈龙骏.中国荒漠化及其防治[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
[3]	国家林业局.第四次中国荒漠化和沙化状况公报[N].中国绿色时报,2011-01-05(A02).
[4]	包岩峰,杨柳,龙超,等.中国防沙治沙60年回顾与展望[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(02):144~150.
[5]	鄢武先,邓东周,余凌帆,等.川西北地区沙化土地治理有关技术问题探讨——以川西北防沙治沙试点示范工程为例[J].四川林业科技,2015,36(03):62~68.
[6]	赵廷宁,丁国栋,王秀茹,等.中国防沙治沙主要模式[J].水土保持研究,2002(03):118~123.
[7]	赵润林,潘凌安.辽宁西北部地区沙化和荒漠化土地治理技术研究[J].防护林科技,2006(05):30~32.
[8]	贺丽,钟成刚,邓东周,等.高寒沙区草地植被恢复及重建途径研究进展[J].四川林业科技,2014,35(06):32~37.
[9]	肖萌.基于沙区环境的几种灌草植物种子萌发及出苗特性研究[D].北京林业大学,2014.
[10]	葛娈,黄冬,马焕成,等.云南干热河谷不同居群坡柳叶片的旱生结构比较[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(05):138~143.
[11]	李欢,樊军锋,高建社,等.黑杨叶片旱生结构的比较[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(03):113~118.
[12]	黄振英,吴鸿,胡正海.30种新疆沙生植物的结构及其对沙漠环境的适应[J].植物生态学报,1997(06):34~43.
[13]	燕玲,李红,刘艳.13种锦鸡儿属植物叶的解剖生态学研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002(01):100~106.
[14]	Fahmy G M.Leaf anatomy and its relation to the ecophysiology of some non-succulent desert plants from Egypt[J].Journal of Arid Environments,1997,36(3):499~526.
[15]	黄振英,吴鸿,胡正海.新疆10种沙生植物旱生结构的解剖学研究[J].西北植物学报,1995(06):56~61.
[16]	王彦淇,丁岩,李璐,等.元江干热河谷不同居群猪屎豆营养器官旱生结构比较[J].西南林业大学学报,2017,37(01):66~72 +81.
[17]	宋玉霞,于卫平,王立英,等.贺兰山10种不同植物的旱生结构研究[J].西北植物学报,1997(05):61~68.
[18]	徐扬,陈小红,赵安玖.川西高原4种苹果属植物叶片解剖结构与其抗旱性分析[J].西北植物学报,2015,35(11):2227~2234.
[19]	杜建会,刘安隆,董玉祥,等.华南海岸典型沙生植物根系构型特征[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(08):888~895.
[20]	郭京衡,曾凡江,李尝君,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘三种防护林植物根系构型及其生态适应策略[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(01):36~44.
[21]	Fitter AH.The topology and geometry of plant root systems:influence of watering rate on root system topology in Trifolium pratense[J].Annals of Botany,1986,58,91~101.
[22]	Fitter AH.An architectural approach to comparative ecology of plant root systems[J].New Phytologist,1987,106,61~77.
[23]	单立山,李毅,董秋莲,等.红砂根系构型对干旱的生态适应[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(05):1283~1290.
[24]	杨小林,张希明,李义玲,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地3种植物根系构型及其生境适应策略[J].植物生态学报,2008(06):1268~1276.
[25]	李莹,曾晓琳,游明鸿,等.5种川西北沙化地草本植物生态适应策略的差异性[J].草业科学,2016,33(05):843~850.
[26]	王林龙.干旱胁迫及沙埋对沙生植物表型可塑性的影响[D].中国林业科学研究院,2015.
[27]	余叔文,汤章城.植物生理与分子生物学[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.
[28]	何建社,张利,刘千里,等.岷江干旱河谷区典型灌木对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应[J].生态学报,2018,38(07):2362~2371.
[29]	陈少裕.膜脂过氧化对植物细胞的伤害[J].植物生理学通讯,1991(02):84~90.
[30]	汤坤贤,陈慧英,陈玉珍,等.干旱胁迫对3种海岛植被修复植物生长与生理指标的影响[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2017,56(06 ):845~851.
[31]	王进.几种沙生植物耐沙埋的生理生态学机制研究[D].鲁东大学,2012.
[32]	孙铁军,苏日古嘎,马万里,等.10种禾草苗期抗旱性的比较研究[J].草业学报,2008(04):42~49.
[33]	刘金龙,王莹,许爱云,等.干旱胁迫下5种禾本科牧草幼苗期的生理特性[J].草业科学,2018,35(05):1106~1115.
[34]	丁玉梅,马龙海,周晓罡,等.干旱胁迫下马铃薯叶片脯氨酸、丙二醛含量变化及与耐旱性的相关性分析[J].西南农业学报,2013,26(01):106~110.
[35]	季杨,张新全,彭燕,等.干旱胁迫对鸭茅根、叶保护酶活性、渗透物质含量及膜质过氧化作用的影响[J].草业学报,2014,23(03):144~151.
[36]	赵哈林,曲浩,周瑞莲,等.沙埋对两种沙生植物幼苗生长的影响及其生理响应差异[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(09):830~838.
[37]	裴斌,张光灿,张淑勇,等.土壤干旱胁迫对沙棘叶片光合作用和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(05):1386~1396.
[38]	K.V.Chaitanya,D.Sundar,S.Masilamani,A.Ramachandra Reddy.Variation in heat stress-induced antioxidant enzyme activities among three mulberry cultivars[J].Plant Growth Regulation,2002,36(2).
[39]	吴永波,叶波.高温干旱复合胁迫对构树幼苗抗氧化酶活性和活性氧代谢的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(02):403~410.
[40]	Bowler C,And M V M,Inze D.Superoxide Dismutase and Stress Tolerance[J].Annu.rev.plant Physiol.plant Mol.biol,1992,43(1):83~116.
[41]	范苏鲁,苑兆和,冯立娟,等.干旱胁迫对大丽花生理生化指标的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(03):651~657.
[42]	赵哈林,曲浩,周瑞莲,等.沙埋对两种灌木生长影响及其生理响应差异[J].草业学报,2014,23(01):185~191.
[43]	潘昕,邱权,李吉跃,等.干旱胁迫对青藏高原6种植物生理指标的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(13):3558~3567.
[44]	潘昕,李吉跃,王军辉,等.干旱胁迫对青藏高原4种灌木生理指标的影响[J].林业科学研究,2013,26(03):352~358.
[45]	李秀玲,刘开强,杨志民,等.干旱胁迫对4种观赏草枯叶率及生理指标的影响[J].草地学报,2012,20(01):76~82.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(318) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()

Proportional views

Effects of Drought Stress on Ecological Structure and Physiological Characteristics of Sand-control Plants

Sichuan Academic of Forestry, Chengdu 610081, China;Sichuan Aba Forestry Science and Technology Research Institute, Wenchuan 623000, China;Aba Vocational College, Wenchuan 623000, China

Received Date: 2018-09-03

Key words:

Abstract: Biological control plays a dominant role in the process of controlling desertification. The sand-control plants will gradually form the morphological structure and physiological characteristics adaptating to drought under the harsh environment of drought, strong sunshine, poor soil, large wind and sand, low temperature and so on. Morphological structure and physiological characteristics will be elaborated for plant screening.

HTML

Reference (45)

[1]	王涛.中国沙漠与沙漠化[M].石家庄:河北科学技术出版社,1997.
[2]	慈龙骏.中国荒漠化及其防治[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
[3]	国家林业局.第四次中国荒漠化和沙化状况公报[N].中国绿色时报,2011-01-05(A02).
[4]	包岩峰,杨柳,龙超,等.中国防沙治沙60年回顾与展望[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(02):144~150.
[5]	鄢武先,邓东周,余凌帆,等.川西北地区沙化土地治理有关技术问题探讨——以川西北防沙治沙试点示范工程为例[J].四川林业科技,2015,36(03):62~68.
[6]	赵廷宁,丁国栋,王秀茹,等.中国防沙治沙主要模式[J].水土保持研究,2002(03):118~123.
[7]	赵润林,潘凌安.辽宁西北部地区沙化和荒漠化土地治理技术研究[J].防护林科技,2006(05):30~32.
[8]	贺丽,钟成刚,邓东周,等.高寒沙区草地植被恢复及重建途径研究进展[J].四川林业科技,2014,35(06):32~37.
[9]	肖萌.基于沙区环境的几种灌草植物种子萌发及出苗特性研究[D].北京林业大学,2014.
[10]	葛娈,黄冬,马焕成,等.云南干热河谷不同居群坡柳叶片的旱生结构比较[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(05):138~143.
[11]	李欢,樊军锋,高建社,等.黑杨叶片旱生结构的比较[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(03):113~118.
[12]	黄振英,吴鸿,胡正海.30种新疆沙生植物的结构及其对沙漠环境的适应[J].植物生态学报,1997(06):34~43.
[13]	燕玲,李红,刘艳.13种锦鸡儿属植物叶的解剖生态学研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002(01):100~106.
[14]	Fahmy G M.Leaf anatomy and its relation to the ecophysiology of some non-succulent desert plants from Egypt[J].Journal of Arid Environments,1997,36(3):499~526.
[15]	黄振英,吴鸿,胡正海.新疆10种沙生植物旱生结构的解剖学研究[J].西北植物学报,1995(06):56~61.
[16]	王彦淇,丁岩,李璐,等.元江干热河谷不同居群猪屎豆营养器官旱生结构比较[J].西南林业大学学报,2017,37(01):66~72	+81.
[17]	宋玉霞,于卫平,王立英,等.贺兰山10种不同植物的旱生结构研究[J].西北植物学报,1997(05):61~68.
[18]	徐扬,陈小红,赵安玖.川西高原4种苹果属植物叶片解剖结构与其抗旱性分析[J].西北植物学报,2015,35(11):2227~2234.
[19]	杜建会,刘安隆,董玉祥,等.华南海岸典型沙生植物根系构型特征[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(08):888~895.
[20]	郭京衡,曾凡江,李尝君,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘三种防护林植物根系构型及其生态适应策略[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(01):36~44.
[21]	Fitter AH.The topology and geometry of plant root systems:influence of watering rate on root system topology in Trifolium pratense[J].Annals of Botany,1986,58,91~101.
[22]	Fitter AH.An architectural approach to comparative ecology of plant root systems[J].New Phytologist,1987,106,61~77.
[23]	单立山,李毅,董秋莲,等.红砂根系构型对干旱的生态适应[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(05):1283~1290.
[24]	杨小林,张希明,李义玲,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地3种植物根系构型及其生境适应策略[J].植物生态学报,2008(06):1268~1276.
[25]	李莹,曾晓琳,游明鸿,等.5种川西北沙化地草本植物生态适应策略的差异性[J].草业科学,2016,33(05):843~850.
[26]	王林龙.干旱胁迫及沙埋对沙生植物表型可塑性的影响[D].中国林业科学研究院,2015.
[27]	余叔文,汤章城.植物生理与分子生物学[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.
[28]	何建社,张利,刘千里,等.岷江干旱河谷区典型灌木对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应[J].生态学报,2018,38(07):2362~2371.
[29]	陈少裕.膜脂过氧化对植物细胞的伤害[J].植物生理学通讯,1991(02):84~90.
[30]	汤坤贤,陈慧英,陈玉珍,等.干旱胁迫对3种海岛植被修复植物生长与生理指标的影响[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2017,56(06	):845~851.
[31]	王进.几种沙生植物耐沙埋的生理生态学机制研究[D].鲁东大学,2012.
[32]	孙铁军,苏日古嘎,马万里,等.10种禾草苗期抗旱性的比较研究[J].草业学报,2008(04):42~49.
[33]	刘金龙,王莹,许爱云,等.干旱胁迫下5种禾本科牧草幼苗期的生理特性[J].草业科学,2018,35(05):1106~1115.
[34]	丁玉梅,马龙海,周晓罡,等.干旱胁迫下马铃薯叶片脯氨酸、丙二醛含量变化及与耐旱性的相关性分析[J].西南农业学报,2013,26(01):106~110.
[35]	季杨,张新全,彭燕,等.干旱胁迫对鸭茅根、叶保护酶活性、渗透物质含量及膜质过氧化作用的影响[J].草业学报,2014,23(03):144~151.
[36]	赵哈林,曲浩,周瑞莲,等.沙埋对两种沙生植物幼苗生长的影响及其生理响应差异[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(09):830~838.
[37]	裴斌,张光灿,张淑勇,等.土壤干旱胁迫对沙棘叶片光合作用和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(05):1386~1396.
[38]	K.V.Chaitanya,D.Sundar,S.Masilamani,A.Ramachandra Reddy.Variation in heat stress-induced antioxidant enzyme activities among three mulberry cultivars[J].Plant Growth Regulation,2002,36(2).
[39]	吴永波,叶波.高温干旱复合胁迫对构树幼苗抗氧化酶活性和活性氧代谢的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(02):403~410.
[40]	Bowler C,And M V M,Inze D.Superoxide Dismutase and Stress Tolerance[J].Annu.rev.plant Physiol.plant Mol.biol,1992,43(1):83~116.
[41]	范苏鲁,苑兆和,冯立娟,等.干旱胁迫对大丽花生理生化指标的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(03):651~657.
[42]	赵哈林,曲浩,周瑞莲,等.沙埋对两种灌木生长影响及其生理响应差异[J].草业学报,2014,23(01):185~191.
[43]	潘昕,邱权,李吉跃,等.干旱胁迫对青藏高原6种植物生理指标的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(13):3558~3567.
[44]	潘昕,李吉跃,王军辉,等.干旱胁迫对青藏高原4种灌木生理指标的影响[J].林业科学研究,2013,26(03):352~358.
[45]	李秀玲,刘开强,杨志民,等.干旱胁迫对4种观赏草枯叶率及生理指标的影响[J].草地学报,2012,20(01):76~82.

Effects of Drought Stress on Ecological Structure and Physiological Characteristics of Sand-control Plants

doi: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2018.06.019

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Related

Proportional views