The Respond of Soil Animal Communities on the Edge Effect of Phoebe zhennan Plantations
More Information-
摘要: 为研究四川盆地西缘山地土壤动物群落对桢楠(Phoebe zhennan)人工林边缘效应的响应,选择58年生的桢楠人工林为研究对象,采用手捡法和干湿生漏斗分离法对桢楠人工林林地中心及林地边缘的土壤动物群落进行了调查。调查共捕获土壤动物887只,隶属于3门9纲12目23科。调查结果显示:各样地土壤动物个体数排序为:林地边缘(5.37×104)>林地中心(2.69×104);类群数排序为:林地边缘(21)>林地中心(17),土壤动物群落具有明显的表聚性;林地边缘的密度类群指数(DG)显著高于林地中心,样地间林地边缘与林地中心的丰富度指数(D)存在极显著差异(P<0.01),各样地间多样性指数(H')、优势度指数(C)、均匀度指数(J)差异不显著(P>0.05)。综上,林地边缘效应导致林缘土壤动物的密度、类群数和多样性特征等方面明显高于林地中心。Abstract: In order to study the respond of soil animal communit on the edge effect of Phoebe zhenna plantations of the western borders of the Sichuan Basin mountain, choosing the 58-year-old Phoebe zhenna plantation as objects, Macro-fauna samples were picked up by hand and using Tullgren-Baermann separation methods to investigate the soil animal communities in wooldland margins of Phoebe zhenna plantation woodland.The results showed that a total of 887 individuals of soil fauna, belonging to 3 phylums, 9 classes, 12 orders, 23 families. The survey results displayed that the number order of soil fauna in herb was the edge (5.37×104)>the center (2.69×104), The density order of total species was the edge (21)>the center (17). Soil animal community was obviously surface-accumulated.The density-group index (DG) was significantly higher on the edge than in the center. There were extremely significant differences about the diversity index (D) (P<0.01).The various diversity index (H'), the dominance index (C), evenness (J) were no significant differences (P>0.05). In conclusion, the edge effect led to the synergism of soil animal density, number of species and diversity were significantly higher than those in the center the forest land.
-
[1] 黄玉梅. 亚高山森林植物层次去除对土壤生态过程的影响[D].四川农业大学,2012. [2] 殷秀琴,邱丽丽,杨令宾,等.森林凋落物-土壤动物-土壤系统中营养元素含量关系及分异[J].地理研究,2006,25(02):320~326. [3] Blower J, Wallwork J. Ecology of soil animals[J]. Ecol Soil Anim. 1970. [4] Volkmar W. Biodiversity of soil animals and its function[J]. Eur J of Soil Biol. 2001, 37(4):221~227. [5] 黄玉梅,张健,杨万勤.巨桉人工林土壤动物群落结构特征[J].生态学报, 2006,26(08):2502~2509. [6] 聂立凯,于政达,孔范龙,等. 土壤动物对土壤碳循环的影响研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2019, 38(3):882~890 [7] 蒋海东,杨青,吕宪国.土壤动物在农业生态系统中的研究进展[J].土壤通报, 2006,37(04):805~808. [8] 武海涛,吕宪国,杨青,等.土壤动物主要生态特征与生态功能研究进展[J].土壤学报, 2006,43(02):314~323. [9] 宋理洪,武海涛,吴东辉.我国农田生态系统土壤动物生态学研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(12):2898~2906. [10] 朱永恒,赵春雨,王宗英,等.我国土壤动物群落生态学研究综述[J].生态学杂志, 2005,24(12):1477~1481. [11] 殷秀琴,宋博,董炜华,等.我国土壤动物生态地理研究进展[J].地理学报, 2010,65(01):91~102. [12] 黄旭,文维全,张健, 等.川西高山典型自然植被土壤动物多样性[J].应用生态学报, 2010,21(01):181~190. [13] 刘任涛,赵哈林,赵学勇.流动沙地灌丛内外生境中土壤动物群落结构研究[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(01):167~173. [14] 秦钟,章家恩,李庆芳.城市化地区不同生境下中小型土壤动物群落结构特征[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(12):3049~3056. [15] 吾玛尔·阿布力孜,古丽布斯坦·努尔买买提,阿布都肉苏力·吐孙,等.新疆阜康绿洲不同生境土壤动物群落多样性及其季节动态[J].生态学杂志, 2013,32(06):1412~1420. [16] 刘继亮,曹靖,李世杰,等. 秦岭西部山地次生林和人工林大型土壤动物群落结构特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2012,23(09):2459~2466. [17] 毕润成,杨焕根,朱新军. 山西霍山落叶阔叶林边缘效应的研究[J].西北植物学报, 2004,24(08):1441~1447. [18] 田超,杨新兵,刘阳. 边缘效应及其对森林生态系统影响的研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(08):2184~2192. [19] 卢扬煦,唐成平,严丽平,等.楠木人工林林下植物物种多样性研究[J].浙江林业科技,2012,32(01):11~15. [20] 马莲花,罗豫川,陈诚,等.都江堰灵岩山香樟过熟林种子雨分布特征[J].四川林业科技,2015,36(06):27~31. [21] 黄玉梅. 巨桉人工林土壤动物生态初步研究[D]. 四川农业大学,2006. [22] 尹文英. 中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M].北京:科学出版社,1998. [23] 尹文英. 中国亚热带土壤动物[M].北京:科学出版社,1992. [24] 李鸿兴,隋敬之,周士秀. 昆虫分类检索[M].北京:农业出版社,1987. [25] 黄玉梅.土壤动物群落多样性研究进展[J].西部林业科学,2004,33(03):63~68. [26] 廖崇惠,李健雄,黄海涛.南亚热带森林土壤动物群落多样性研究[J].生态学报, 1997,17(05):99~105. [27] [28] 铁烈华,张林成,冯茂松,等. 烘虫温度和时间对中小型土壤动物烘虫分离效果的影响[J].四川农业大学学报,2015,33(01):45~50. [29] [30] 张良辉.川西亚高山云杉人工林分结构调控下植物与土壤动物多样性研究[D].四川农业大学,2010.
计量
- 文章访问数: 389
- HTML全文浏览量: 82
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0