用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

尹程龙, 陈熙易, 李渝, 王意迦. 基于AHP的森林公园型生态文明教育基地评价体系[J]. 四川林业科技. DOI: 10.12172/202405090001
引用本文: 尹程龙, 陈熙易, 李渝, 王意迦. 基于AHP的森林公园型生态文明教育基地评价体系[J]. 四川林业科技. DOI: 10.12172/202405090001
YIN Chenglong, CHEN Xiyi, LI Yu, WANG Yijia. Evaluation system of Ecological Civilization Education Base for forest parks based on AHP[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology. DOI: 10.12172/202405090001
Citation: YIN Chenglong, CHEN Xiyi, LI Yu, WANG Yijia. Evaluation system of Ecological Civilization Education Base for forest parks based on AHP[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology. DOI: 10.12172/202405090001

基于AHP的森林公园型生态文明教育基地评价体系

Evaluation system of Ecological Civilization Education Base for forest parks based on AHP

  • 摘要: 为概括森林公园型场所创建生态文明教育基地的质量,采用层次分析法(AHP法)结合德尔菲法(Delphi法),构建出评价指标体系。评价体系共有2个综合层、7个准则层,其中:3个准则层引用《中国森林公园风景资源质量等级评定标准》(GB/T18005-1999)进行评价,且与该国标中风景资源质量、区域环境质量、开发利用条件三者的相互权重一致,且均不再下设指标,确保了评价体系具的易用性;另4个准则层合计下设16个指标,权重较高的指标为申报装帧资料、音像资料、活动参与人次和宣传推广,建议各申报主体在创建活动中着重关注。评价得分称为建设质量值,并划分为优秀、良好和一般3个级别。研究结果可供相关部门在评审活动中参考,亦可作为各单位开展相关工作之借鉴。

     

    Abstract: To summarize the quality of creating an Ecological Civilization Education Base(ECEB) for forest parks, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) combined with the Delphi method was used to construct an evaluation index system. The evaluation system consists of 2 comprehensive layers and 7 criterion layers. Among them, 3 criterion layers refer to the "Quality Rating Standards for Scenic Resources in Chinese Forest Parks" (GB/T18005-1999) for evaluation, and are consistent with the mutual weights of scenic resource quality, regional environmental quality, and development and utilization conditions in the national standard, ensuring the usability of the evaluation system; There are a total of 16 indicators under the other 4 criteria layers, and the indicators with higher weights are the Application of binding materials, Audio-visual materials, Number of participants in activities, and Promotion effectiveness, and it is best to pay more attention to these tasks. The evaluation score, known as the construction quality value, is categorized into three grades: excellent, good, and fair.The research findings can be used as a reference by relevant departments during the evaluation process, and can also serve as a reference for various units when undertaking related work.

     

/

返回文章
返回