用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

辛云玲, 弥芸, 李群, 等. 保水剂和微生物菌剂混施对山杏和刺槐生长影响[J]. 四川林业科技, 2023, 44(5): 89−94. DOI: 10.12172/202211210001
引用本文: 辛云玲, 弥芸, 李群, 等. 保水剂和微生物菌剂混施对山杏和刺槐生长影响[J]. 四川林业科技, 2023, 44(5): 89−94. DOI: 10.12172/202211210001
XIN Y L, MI Y, LI Q, et al. Effects of mixed application of water-retaining agent and microbial inoculum on the growth of Armeniaca sibirica and Robinia pseudoacacia[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2023, 44(5): 89−94. DOI: 10.12172/202211210001
Citation: XIN Y L, MI Y, LI Q, et al. Effects of mixed application of water-retaining agent and microbial inoculum on the growth of Armeniaca sibirica and Robinia pseudoacacia[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2023, 44(5): 89−94. DOI: 10.12172/202211210001

保水剂和微生物菌剂混施对山杏和刺槐生长影响

Effects of Mixed Application of Water-retaining Agent and Microbial Inoculum on the Growth of Armeniaca sibirica and Robinia pseudoacacia

  • 摘要: 以半干旱区常用造林树种刺槐和山杏为试材,设置保水剂0 g·株−1、20 g·株−1、30 g·株−1和微生物菌剂0 g·株−1、5 g·株−1、10 g·株−1混施共9组处理,分析不同处理下株高、地径和叶面积等植物功能性状指标差异,为实际造林保水剂和微生物菌剂的施用提供理论依据。结果表明,30 g·株−1保水剂(T7)刺槐株高促进作用最显著,是对照组(T1)的2.69倍。20 g·株−1保水剂(T4)对山杏株高促进作用最大,超过对照组20.94%;10 g·株−1微生物菌剂(T3)和单施5 g·株−1微生物菌剂(T2)处理下刺槐和山杏地径生长量最大,分别达到6.42 cm和6.39 cm;混施处理对促进叶片面积生长效果最佳,山杏和刺槐分别在T8(30 g·株−1保水剂+5 g·株−1微生物菌剂)、T5(20 g·株−1保水剂+5 g·株−1微生物菌剂)达到最大值。通过K值分析发现,保水剂对刺槐的株高和叶面积生长影响较之微生物菌剂更为显著,均呈现出先降后升的规律,对地径生长影响作用差异不大,对于山杏来说,微生物菌剂对株高生长影响比保水剂影响显著,对地径生长量和叶面积的影响差别不大。

     

    Abstract: Robinia pseudoacacia and Armeniaca sibirica, commonly used as afforestation trees in semi-arid areas, were used as test materials, and 9 groups of treatments were set up, in which water-retaining agents (0 g plant−1, 20 g·plant−1, 30 g·plant−1) were mixed with microbial inoculums (0 g plant−1, 5 g·plant−1, 10 g·plant−1). The differences of plant functional indexes such as plant height, ground diameter and leaf area under different treatments were analyzed, which provided theoretical basis for the application of water-retaining agent and microbial inoculums in actual afforestation. The results showed 30 g·plant−1 water-retaining agent (T7) concentration had the most significant effect on promoting the height of Robinia pseudoacacia, which was 2.69 times of the control group (T1). 20 g·plant−1 water-retaining agent (T4) had the highest promoting effect on plant height of Armeniaca sibirica, which was 20.94% higher than control group. Under the treatment of 10 g·plant−1 microbial agent (T3) and 5 g·plant−1 microbial agent (T2), the ground diameter growth of Robinia pseudoacacia and Armeniaca sibirica was the largest, reaching 6.42 cmand 6.39 cm, respectively. Mixed application treatment had the best effect on the growth of leaf area, and Robinia pseudoacacia and Armeniaca sibirica reached the maximum value at T8 (30 g·plant−1water retaining agent +5 g·plant−1 microbial agent) and T5 (20 g·plant−1 water retaining agent +5 g·plant−1 microbial agent) respectively. Through K-value analysis, it was found that the effect of water-retaining agent on the growth of plant height and leaf area of Robinia pseudoacacia was more significant than that of microbial inoculants, and both of which showed the law of first decreasing and then increasing, but had little difference on the growth of ground diameter. For Armeniaca sibirica, the effect of microbial inoculants on the growth of plant height was more significant than that of water-retaining agent, and had little difference on the growth of ground diameter and leaf area.

     

/

返回文章
返回