用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

陈俊华, 杨梅, 刘一丁, 等. 川中丘陵区人工柏木林不同结构调整模式对比研究[J]. 四川林业科技, 2022, 43(6): 11−17. DOI: 10.12172/202206010003
引用本文: 陈俊华, 杨梅, 刘一丁, 等. 川中丘陵区人工柏木林不同结构调整模式对比研究[J]. 四川林业科技, 2022, 43(6): 11−17. DOI: 10.12172/202206010003
CHEN J H, YANG M, LIU Y D, et al. Comparative study on different structural adjustment models of artificial cypress plantation in hilly areas of central Sichuan[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 43(6): 11−17. DOI: 10.12172/202206010003
Citation: CHEN J H, YANG M, LIU Y D, et al. Comparative study on different structural adjustment models of artificial cypress plantation in hilly areas of central Sichuan[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 43(6): 11−17. DOI: 10.12172/202206010003

川中丘陵区人工柏木林不同结构调整模式对比研究

Comparative Study on Different Structural Adjustment Models of Artificial Cypress Plantation in Hilly Areas of Central Sichuan

  • 摘要: 以川中丘陵区人工柏木林两种结构调整改造模式—“带状采伐+补阔”改造林分(采伐带与保留带均为8m,补植阔叶树为桤木、香椿、香樟、喜树)、“生态疏伐”改造林分(按蓄积疏伐强度为25%~30%)和对照林分以及天然次生栎柏混交林作为研究对象,分析生物多样性、乔木生长、灌草盖度和林下更新幼苗数量,结果表明:(1)乔木层丰富度和Shannon-Wiener多样性指数最高的是栎柏混交林,其次是“带状改造+补阔”改造林分。灌、草丰富度均以栎柏混交林最高,其次是“生态疏伐”改造林分;灌木多样性指数最高的是“生态疏伐”改造林分,其次是栎柏混交林;草本Shannon-Wiener多样性指数最高的是栎柏混交林,其次是“生态疏伐”改造林分。对照林分乔灌草层物种丰富度、多样性指数均最低。(2)乔木平均胸径、平均树高按大小排列分别为:“生态疏伐”改造林分>“带状采伐+补阔”改造林分>栎柏混交林>对照,栎柏混交林>“带状采伐+补阔”改造林分>“生态疏伐”改造林分>对照。(3)灌草盖度第一、第二均是带状采伐+补阔”改造林分和栎柏混交林,对照最小。(4)林下更新幼苗以栎柏混交林最多,最少的是对照,“带状采伐+补阔”改造林分和“生态疏伐”改造林分差异不大。(5)对川中丘陵区的人工柏木林应根据不同经营目标科学编制森林经营方案,开展多功能经营,以更好地发挥其多种效益。

     

    Abstract: Two structural adjustment and transformation models of artificial cypress plantation in hilly areas of central Sichuan, that is, the “strip cutting + replanting” model (with the cutting-strip zone and reserved zone were 8m, and the replanted broad-leaved trees were Alnus cremastogyneToona sinensisCinnamomum camphoraCamptotheca acuminata), the “ecological thinning” model (the thinning intensity was 25%~30% in standing volume), the control stand (no cutting treatment) and the natural secondary oak-cypress mixed forest were taken as the research objects, the biodiversity, tree growth, coverage of shrubs and herbs, and the number of regenerated seedlings were analyzed. The results showed that: (1) The oak-cypress mixed forest had the highest tree layer richness and Shannon-Wiener diversity index, followed by the “strip cutting + replanting” model. The richness of shrubs and herbs were the highest in oak-cypress mixed forest, followed by the “ecological thinning” model. The shrub diversity index was the highest in the “ecological thinning” model, followed by the oak-cypress mixed forest. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index of the herbaceous species was the highest in oak-cypress mixed forest, followed by the “ecological thinning” model. However, the species richness and diversity index of the tree, shrub and herb layer of the control stand were the lowest. (2) The average DBH of trees was in the order of the “ecological thinning” model > the “strip cutting + replanting” model > oak-cypress mixed forest > control, and the average tree height was ranked as: the oak-cypress mixed forest > the “strip cutting + replanting” model > the “ecological thinning” model > control. (3) The first and the second highest coverage of shrubs and herbs were the “strip cutting + replanting” model and the oak-cypress mixed forest, and the lowest was the control. (4) In terms of regenerated seedlings under the forest, the largest number was in the oak-cypress mixed forest, and the least was in the control. But, there was little difference between the “strip cutting + replanting” model and the “ecological thinning” model. (5) The forest management plan for the artificial cypress plantation in the hilly areas of central Sichuan should be scientifically formulated according to different management objectives, and multi-functional management approach should be carried out so as to perform its multiple benefits.

     

/

返回文章
返回