用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

廖汇, 时卉, 周皖榕, 等. 基于CiteSpace的社会生态系统脆弱性研究[J]. 四川林业科技, 2023, 44(1): 1−9. DOI: 10.12172/202204230001
引用本文: 廖汇, 时卉, 周皖榕, 等. 基于CiteSpace的社会生态系统脆弱性研究[J]. 四川林业科技, 2023, 44(1): 1−9. DOI: 10.12172/202204230001
LIAO H, SHI H, ZHOU W R, et al. Vulnerability of social ecosystem based on CiteSpace[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2023, 44(1): 1−9. DOI: 10.12172/202204230001
Citation: LIAO H, SHI H, ZHOU W R, et al. Vulnerability of social ecosystem based on CiteSpace[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2023, 44(1): 1−9. DOI: 10.12172/202204230001

基于CiteSpace的社会生态系统脆弱性研究

Vulnerability of Social Ecosystem Based on CiteSpace

  • 摘要: 社会生态系统脆弱性是可持续发展的重要内容和研究热点。以相关概念和理论基础的梳理为展开基础,引入国内外脆弱性研究进展来呈现目前本领域内的总体历程和现状,最后通过Web of Science核心集合数据库和CNKI数据库,运用CiteSpace软件对目前社会生态系统脆弱性的研究进展和研究热点进行分析。结果表明:①本领域总体研究势态良好,发文量中发达国家贡献度较大,美国居于首位,中国发文量第6但贡献度较低。②国内外研究热点趋于一致,但在内容上国外倾向于对理论、定义等的深入研究和完善,国内侧重于运用已有的框架、方法等进行区域性实证研究。③在社会生态系统脆弱性研究中,国外仍侧重于“生态系统”研究,国内侧重于“社会系统”研究。

     

    Abstract: The vulnerability of social ecosystem is an important content and research hotspot of sustainable development. Based on the relevant concepts and theoretical foundations, the research progress of vulnerability at home and abroad was introduced to present the overall history and status quo in this field. Finally, the research progress and hotspots of social ecosystem vulnerability were analyzed by using CiteSpace software through the core collection database of Web of Science and CNKI database. The results showed that: ① In general, the overall research situation in this field was in good condition, with developed countries contributing a lot in the number of published papers, the United States ranking first, and China ranking sixth but with a lower contribution. ② The research hotspots at home and abroad tended to be the same, but in terms of content, foreign countries tended to conduct in-depth research and improvement of theories, definitions, etc., while domestic focused on regional empirical research by using existing frameworks and methods. ③ In the research on the vulnerability of social-ecological systems, foreign countries still focused on “ecosystem” research, while domestic focused on “social system” research.

     

/

返回文章
返回