用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

罗艳, 杨一川, 沈松平, 等. 城市化对成都市植被景观格局影响研究[J]. 四川林业科技, 2021, 42(5): 29−39. DOI: 10.12172/202101280001
引用本文: 罗艳, 杨一川, 沈松平, 等. 城市化对成都市植被景观格局影响研究[J]. 四川林业科技, 2021, 42(5): 29−39. DOI: 10.12172/202101280001
Luo Y, Yang Y C, Shen S P, et al. Study on effects of urbanization on vegetation landscape pattern in Chengdu City[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 42(5): 29−39. DOI: 10.12172/202101280001
Citation: Luo Y, Yang Y C, Shen S P, et al. Study on effects of urbanization on vegetation landscape pattern in Chengdu City[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 42(5): 29−39. DOI: 10.12172/202101280001

城市化对成都市植被景观格局影响研究

Study on Effects of Urbanization on Vegetation Landscape Pattern in Chengdu City

  • 摘要: 为弄清城市化进程中成都市植被景观格局的变化情况,本研究从植被景观要素的基本特征、景观要素的多样性、景观要素斑块基本特征以及景观的形状特征四个方面,选取现有比较成熟的景观格局指数分析了2002—2017年期间成都市植被景观格局的主要特征和变化,主要结果如下。(1)与2002年相比,2017年缺少了低山丘陵常绿阔叶灌丛和灌草丛2大植被类型,这主要是自然演替和人类活动的共同作用的结果。(2)成都市植被景观要素的基本特征显示,2002年成都市植被景观总面积为13757.59 km2,占成都市总面积的95.97%;2017年成都市植被景观总面积为11947.32 km2,占成都市总面积的83.34%。(3)植被景观要素多样性分析结果显示,2002年和2017年,成都市植被景观的丰富度指数(分别为1.364和1.172)、均匀度指数(分别为0.653和0.742)和多样性指数(分别为1.723和1.843)均较低, 优势度指数(分别为4.362和4.328)较高。(4)景观要素斑块基本特征分析结果显示,成都市整体景观破碎度较低,但2017年的景观破碎度指数约为2002年景观破碎度指数的5倍,显示出随着城市化的发展,成都市植被景观总体破碎程度在增加。(5)景观要素形状特征分析结果显示,成都市植被景观要素斑块形状指数多数大于1.5,表明其总体偏离圆形;各景观要素的分维数植均大于1,表明其形状较为复杂。总体上,成都市植被景观格局总体表现出人工景观的破碎化程度较高,天然景观的连通性较好,优势景观占主导地位,多样性较低的特点。此外,城市化对植被的干扰作用日益凸显,有必要通过制定科学合理的产业发展政策和土地利用政策保证城市生态安全。

     

    Abstract: In order to understand the changes of vegetation landscape pattern in Chengdu during the urbanization process, the main characteristics and changes of vegetation landscape pattern in Chengdu from 2002 to 2017 were analyzed by selecting the existing mature landscape pattern index from four aspects: the basic characteristics of vegetation landscape elements, the diversity of landscape elements, the basic characteristics of landscape element patches and the shape characteristics of landscapes. The main results were as follows: (1) Compared with 2002, two vegetation types were missing in 2017, evergreen broad-leaved shrubs and shrub grass on low hills, which were mainly the results of the combination of natural succession and human activities. (2) The basic characteristics of the vegetation landscape elements in Chengdu showed that the total area of vegetation landscape in Chengdu in 2002 was 13757.59 km2, accounting for 95.97% of the total area of Chengdu; in 2017, the total vegetation landscape of Chengdu was 11, 147.32 km2, accounting for 83.34% of the total area of Chengdu. (3) The results of the vegetation landscape element diversity analysis showed that in 2002 and 2017, the richness index (1.364 and 1.172), the evenness index (0.653 and 0.742), and the diversity index (1.723 and 1.843) of vegetation landscape in Chengdu were lower, and the dominance index (4.362 and 4.328) was higher. (4) The results of the basic feature of landscape elements patches analysis showed that the overall landscape fragmentation degree of Chengdu is lower, but the landscape fragmentation index in 2017 was about five times of that in 2002, indicating that with the development of urbanization, the overall fragmentation degree of the vegetation landscape in Chengdu was increasing. (5) The results of the shape characteristics of landscape elements analysis showed that the shape index of the vegetation landscape elements in Chengdu was more than 1.5, indicating that it deviated from the circle on the whole. The fractal dimension of each landscape element was greater than 1, which indicated that the shape was more complex. In summary, the vegetation landscape pattern in Chengdu was characterized by high fragmentation of artificial landscape, good connectivity of natural landscape, dominant landscape and low diversity. In addition, the interference of urbanization on vegetation was increasingly prominent, and it was necessary to ensure urban ecological safety through the formulation of scientific and reasonable industrial development policies and land use policies.

     

/

返回文章
返回