用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

刘怡, 钟毅, 何飞阳, 等. 基于AHP法的城郊游憩林景观及环境质量评价体系构建[J]. 四川林业科技, 2021, 42(2): 66−70. DOI: 10.12172/202009210001
引用本文: 刘怡, 钟毅, 何飞阳, 等. 基于AHP法的城郊游憩林景观及环境质量评价体系构建[J]. 四川林业科技, 2021, 42(2): 66−70. DOI: 10.12172/202009210001
Liu Y, Zhong Y, He F Y, et al. Development of suburban landscape recreation forest quality evaluation system based on AHP method[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 42(2): 66−70. DOI: 10.12172/202009210001
Citation: Liu Y, Zhong Y, He F Y, et al. Development of suburban landscape recreation forest quality evaluation system based on AHP method[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 42(2): 66−70. DOI: 10.12172/202009210001

基于AHP法的城郊游憩林景观及环境质量评价体系构建

Development of Suburban Landscape Recreation Forest Quality Evaluation System Based on AHP Method

  • 摘要: 景观游憩是森林的重要功能,也是生态旅游、森林康养等现代林业产业发展的基础。为了更好地开展风景游憩林建设,明确风景游憩林质量的各项影响因子之间的关系,运用层次分析法(AHP)建立质量评价体系。结果显示:(1)以风景游憩林的生态价值、美学价值、社会价值三个方面为切入点,建立拥有生态效益、美学效益、社会效益3个准则层,和13个评价因子指标层的评价体系;(2)从评价体系中各层指标权重来看,美学效益0.5278>生态效益0.3325>社会效益0.1397。生态效益中权重值最高的评价指标为空气负离子,美学效益中权重值最高的评价指标为色彩丰富度,社会效益中权重值最高的评价指标为舒适度。

     

    Abstract: Landscape recreation is an important function of forest, and it is also the foundation of modern forestry industry development such as ecotourism and forest health care. In order to better carry out the development of landscape recreation forests and clarify the relationships among the influencing factors of the quality of landscape recreation forest, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to establish a quality evaluation system. The results showed that: (1) Based on the ecological, aesthetic, and social values of landscape recreation forest, an evaluation system with three criteria layers of ecological benefit, aesthetic benefit, and social benefit and 13 evaluation factor index layers was established; (2) According to the index weight of each layer in the evaluation system, aesthetic benefit was 0.5278 > ecological benefit was 0.3325> social benefit was 0.1397. From the perspective of ecological benefit, aesthetic benefit and social benefit, the evaluation index with the highest weight value are air anion, color richness and comfort.

     

/

返回文章
返回