用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

川南地区丛生竹硬头黄竹带状皆伐对其生长及产量的影响

Effects of Strip Clear-cutting on the Growth and Yield of Bambusa rigida in Southern Sichuan

  • 摘要: 以长宁县硬头黄竹为研究对象,分别在龙头镇、竹海镇样地设置长度均为60 m,宽度为3 m、6 m、9 m皆伐带;3 m~6 m、6 m~9 m皆伐带间设置保留带,保留带宽度均为6 m;另外在样地附近设置一个6 m×60 m对照带。采用机械式带状皆伐1年后,通过调查和数据处理,分析其生长状况,显著性特征、生物量(地上部分)。结果表明:(1)两个样地中均发萌枝,且萌枝面积均为9 m皆伐带 > 6 m皆伐带 > 3 m皆伐带。从龙头镇来看,各皆伐带和保留带的发笋量均明显高于对照带,最大为6 m~9 m保留带,达到4 976±97株·hm-2;从竹海镇来看,3 m皆伐带、3 m~6 m保留带、6 m~9 m保留带发笋数高于对照带,6 m~9 m保留带发笋数最高,达到11583株·hm-2。(2)单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和多重比较表明,龙头镇和竹海镇竹笋平均胸径除6 m皆伐带和9 m皆伐带间差异不显著外(p>0.05),其他每个带之间差异均显著(p<0.05);龙头镇竹笋平均高除3m皆伐带和6m皆伐带之间、6 m皆伐带和9m皆伐带之间差异不显著外(p>0.05),其余各带之间差异均显著(p>0.05),竹海镇竹笋平均高除6 m皆伐带和9 m皆伐带之间差异不显著外(p>0.05),其余各带之间差异均显著(p<0.05)。(3)根据张鹏等在长宁县对硬头黄竹胸径与生物量拟合的指数回归模型,可以计算出经过带状皆伐改造试验后,龙头镇3 m~6 m保留带、6 m~9 m保留带1 a生竹每公顷产量分别比对照提高了92.76%、175.21%。竹海镇3 m~6 m保留带、6 m~9 m保留带1a生竹每公顷产量分别比对照提高了111.89%、161.58%。(4)通过本试验对该地硬头黄竹进行带状皆伐改造,发现6 m~9 m保留带竹林长势最好,生物量最高,改造效果最好。

     

    Abstract: Bambusa rigida in Changning County was taken as the research object,the clear cutting belts were set in lengths of 60 m and widths of 3 m,6 m and 9 m.in the sample plots of Longtou Town and Zhuhai Town.The reserved zone was set between 3 m~6 m and 6 m~9 m cutting belt.The retention band had a retention bandwidth of 6 m;in addition,a 6×60 control zone was placed near the sample plot.After one year of mechanical strip clearing,the growth status,significant characteristics,and biomass (aboveground) were analyzed through investigation and data processing.The results showed that (1) the shoots were found in both plots,and the order of sprouting area size was 9m cutting belt > 6 m cutting belt > 3 m cutting belt.In Longtou town,the amount of shoots in each cutting belt and retaining belt was significantly higher than that in the control belt,and the maximum was 6 m~9 m retention belt,reaching 4 976±97 plants hm-2.In Zhuhai Town,the shoot number in the 3 m cutting belt,3 m~6 m retention zone and the 6 m~9 m zone were higher than that of the control zone,and the number of shoots in the 6 m~9 m retention zone was the highest,reaching 11 583 plants·hm-2.(2) One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons showed that the average breast diameter of bamboo shoots in Longtou Town and Zhuhai Town were not significantly different between the 6 m belt and the 9m belt (p>0.05),but the difference between each other belt were significant (p<0.05);the average height of bamboo shoots in Longtou town was not significantly different between the 3m belt and the 6m belt,or the 6m belt and the 9m belt (p>0.05),and the differences between the other belts were significant (p>0.05),the average height of bamboo shoots in Zhuhai Town was not significantly different from that of 6m harvesting belt and 9m harvesting belt (p>0.05),and the differences between the other belts were significant (p<0.05).(3) According to the exponential regression model and other fittings on the DBH and biomass,it could be calculated that after the strip-shaped clear cutting test,the yield of the 3 m~6 m retention zone and 6 m~9 m retention in Longtou town was 92.76% and 175.21% higher than that of the control.The yield of the 3 m~6 m retention zone and the 6 m~9 m retention zone in Zhuhai Town was 111.89% and 161.58% higher than that of the control.(4) Through the test,it was found that the 6 m~9 m retaining bamboo forest had the best growth,the highest biomass and the best transformation effect.

     

/

返回文章
返回