用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

同域分布鼬獾与豹猫活动节律分化及其共存机制

Activity Rhythm Partitioning and Coexistence Mechanisms of Sympatric Chinese Ferret Badger and Leopard Cat

  • 摘要: 同域分布的豹猫(Prionailurus bengalensis)和鼬獾(Melogale moschata)具有竞争关系,为了探究二者的日活动节律、时间生态位和共存机制,本研究于2016年5月至2018年3月在广东连南大鲵保护区共布设60台红外相机进行监测。期间共获得独立有效照片豹猫256张,鼬獾1290张,采用核密度估计法、重叠指数和相对丰富度指数对二者进行分析。结果表明:(1)鼬獾属于典型的夜行性动物,其日活动模式为双峰型,活动高峰集中在03:00—05:00,21:00—24:00;豹猫以夜间活动为主,偶尔出现昼间活动,具有明显的晨昏性,其活动高峰出现在04:00—06:00,19:00—24:00。(2)豹猫和鼬獾的重叠指数为中度重叠(∆=0.77,P<0.01),且重叠部分集中在晚上18:00至次日06:00。(3)豹猫和鼬獾各自在冷暖季的日活动节律高度重叠(豹猫:∆=0.88,P=0.13,鼬獾:∆=0.91,P=0.01),季节性时间生态位分化不明显。(4)豹猫和鼬獾在冷季的重叠程度略高于暖季(冷季∆=0.77,暖季∆=0.73)。表明二者在冷季的活动频率有所提升,但并未改变日活动模式。(5)鼬獾和豹猫在保护区各海拔段种群密度相差不大,活动节律差异不显著,二者在常绿阔叶林的种群密度远高于常绿落叶阔叶混交林,表明二者的核心分布区域集中在中低海拔的常绿阔叶林地带。(6)鼬獾在秋冬季的活动频率远高于春夏季,豹猫则在夏季的6月、8月和冬季12月、1月具有较强的活动频率。本研究结果显示,豹猫和鼬獾可以通过占据不同的时间生态位来减少竞争,实现共存,但时间生态位的分化不是二者同域共存的主要因素。建议保护区继续加强对野生动物的监测力度,掌握保护区野生动物资源动态变化情况。

     

    Abstract: Sympatric leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) and Chinese ferret badgers (Melogale moschata) exhibit competitive interactions. To investigate their diel activity rhythms, temporal niche partitioning, and coexistence mechanisms, this study deployed 60 infrared cameras in the Liannan Giant Salamander Nature Reserve, Guangdong Province, from May 2016 to March 2018. A total of 256 independent photographs of leopard cats and 1,290 of Chinese ferret badgers were obtained. Analyses were conducted using kernel density estimation, overlap indices, and relative abundance indices. The results indicate that: (1) The Chinese ferret badger is a typical nocturnal species with a bimodal activity pattern, peaking between 03:00–05:00 and 21:00–24:00. The leopard cat is primarily nocturnal but occasionally exhibits diurnal activity, showing distinct crepuscular peaks between 04:00–06:00 and 19:00–24:00. (2) The temporal overlap between leopard cats and Chinese ferret badgers was moderate (∆ = 0.77, P < 0.01), with overlapping activity concentrated between 18:00 and 06:00. (3) Both species showed high seasonal activity rhythm overlap within themselves (leopard cat: ∆ = 0.88, P = 0.13; Chinese ferret badger: ∆ = 0.91, P = 0.01), indicating no significant seasonal temporal niche differentiation. (4) Overlap between the two species was slightly higher in the cold season than in the warm season (cold season ∆ = 0.77, warm season ∆ = 0.73), suggesting increased activity frequency in the cold season without altering their diel activity patterns. (5) Population densities of both species across different elevations in the reserve were similar, with no significant differences in activity rhythms. Their densities were much higher in evergreen broadleaf forests than in evergreen-deciduous broadleaf mixed forests, indicating core distribution areas concentrated in mid-to-low elevation evergreen broadleaf forests. (6) Chinese ferret badgers were much more active in autumn and winter than in spring and summer, while leopard cats showed higher activity frequencies in June, August, December, and January.These findings suggest that leopard cats and Chinese ferret badgers may reduce competition and achieve coexistence by occupying different temporal niches, although temporal niche partitioning is not the primary factor facilitating their sympatric coexistence. It is recommended that the reserve continue to strengthen wildlife monitoring efforts to track dynamic changes in wildlife resources.

     

/

返回文章
返回