用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

红外相机陷阱前微环境对鸟兽监测的影响

Influence of microenvironment in front of infrared camera traps on birds and mammals monitoring

  • 摘要: 红外相机陷阱因其工作效率高、对野生动物影响小、适用于多种环境等优势被广泛应用于生物多样性调查监测。然而,红外相机前微环境对野生动物拍摄率的影响以及不同微环境下红外相机监测数据的差异性尚缺乏研究。2021年7月12日至2021年10月23日,在苍山海拔2600~2800 m区间选取5个样方,每个样方安装3台红外相机进行对比监测,分别为红外相机前空旷平坦的对照组、相机前放置树枝的树枝组以及放置石块的石块组。结果共拍摄独立有效监测照片515张,鸟兽共29种,包括兽类5目10科13种,鸟类3目6科16种,其中雀形目鸟类14种,鸮形目鸟类1种,鸡形目鸟类1种。树枝组监测到鸟类物种数11种,雀形目9种,石块组监测到鸟类6种,雀形目4种,对照组只监测到鸡形目鸟类1种;树枝组所拍摄的鸟类照片中,有88%位于树枝上;石块组拍摄的鸟类照片中,有76%位于石块上。鸟类物种数以及拍摄率均为树枝组>石块组>对照组(t检验, P≤0.05)。树枝组拍摄到的兽类为12种,石块组拍摄到的兽类为11种,对照组为9种;石块组的兽类拍摄率显著高于树枝组和对照组(t检验, P≤0.05)。研究表明红外相机前微环境对鸟兽监测具有显著影响,树枝和石块对鸟类有吸引作用,尤其会增加小型雀形目鸟类拍摄率和物种捕获数;石块对兽类吸引作用更明显。后续在使用红外相机进行物种监测时应注意红外相机放置微环境对监测效果的影响。

     

    Abstract: Infrared camera traps are extensively utilized in biodiversity surveys and monitoring due to their advantages, including high operational efficiency, minimal disturbance to wildlife, and adaptability to diverse environments. However, limited research has been conducted on the influence of the micro-environment surrounding infrared cameras on animal detection rates and the variability in monitoring data across different microenvironments. From July 12, 2021 to October 23, 2021, five quadrats were established within an altitude range of 2,600-2,800 meters on Cangshan Mountain. Each quadrat was equipped with three infrared cameras for comparative monitoring. The experimental design included a control group with an open and flat area in front of the cameras, a branch group with branches positioned in front of the cameras, and a stone group with stones placed in front of the cameras.The study yielded a total of 515 independent and effective monitoring photographs, documenting 29 species of birds and mammals. Specifically, 13 mammal species from 5 orders and 10 families, and 16 bird species from 3 orders and 6 families were recorded. Among the birds, there were 14 species of Passeriformes, 1 species of Strigiformes, and 1 species of Galliformes. In the branch group, 11 bird species were detected, including 9 species of Passeriformes. In the stone group, 6 bird species were observed, with 4 species of Passeriformes. In the control group, only 1 species of Galliformes was detected. Notably, 88% of the bird photographs in the branch group were taken on branches, while 76% of the bird photographs in the stone group were taken on stones. Both the number of bird species and the detection rate followed the order: branch group > stone group > control group (t-test, P ≤ 0.05). For mammals, 12 species were photographed in the branch group, 11 species in the stone group, and 9 species in the control group. The detection rate of mammals was significantly higher in the stone group compared to both the branch and control groups (t-test, P ≤ 0.05).This research demonstrates that the microenvironment surrounding infrared cameras significantly influences the monitoring of birds and mammals. Branches and stones exhibit an attractive effect on birds, particularly enhancing the detection rate and species richness of small Passeriformes. Stones have a more pronounced attractive effect on mammals. Future studies employing infrared cameras should consider the impact of the microenvironment on monitoring outcomes.

     

/

返回文章
返回