用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

林下种植中药材对枯落物和土壤水源涵养能力的影响

Effects of planting Chinese herbal medicine under Chinese fir forest on litter and soil water conservation

  • 摘要: 以浙西南地区种植多花黄精和白及4年后的杉木林地为对象,比较分析林下中药材种植后枯落物和土壤水源涵养能力的变化,为林下药材种植及森林可持续经营,促进森林四库建设提供参考依据。结果表明:中药材种植后杉木林下枯落物储量和持水量显著下降,种植多花黄精和白及的杉木林地枯落物储量分别比对照显著减少了49.7%~51.5%(P<0.05),持水量显著降低了15.1%~20.2%(P<0.05);枯落物持水量、持水速率与浸水时间的关系分别符合对数函数y=a Ln(t)+b和幂函数y=a tb,y与t的相关性显著(P<0.05);土壤容重略有下降,非毛管孔隙度和总孔隙度略有增加,与对照相比,土壤容重下降了5.9%~9.3%,非毛管孔隙度和总孔隙度分别增加了1.2%~12.4%、4.0%~7.5%;土壤最大持水量增加了4.7%~6.2%。综上,杉木林下中药材种植对林下枯落物储量及其水源涵养能力的影响是显著负向的,对林下土壤水源涵养能力的影响正向但不显著,需要更长时间尺度上的定位监测。

     

    Abstract: Took the Chinese fir forest planted with Polygonatum cyrtonema and Bletilla striata for 4 years later in the southwest of Zhejiang as the research object, the changes of litter and soil water conservation capacity was analyzed, to providing reference basis for planting Chinese herbal medicine under forest, sustainable forest management and four banks of forests construction. The results showed as follows: the litter reserves and litter water holding capacity of Chinese fir forest planted Polygonatum cyrtonema and Bletilla striata were significantly decreased, separately reduced by 49.7%~51.5% (P<0.05) and 15.1%~20.2% (P<0.05) compared with the control (CK). The relationships of litter water holding capacity, water holding rate and soaking time were respectively in accordance with the logarithm function y=a Ln(t)+b and the power function y=a tb, the correlation between y and t was significant (P<0.05). The soil bulk density decreased slightly. and the non-capillary porosity and total porosity increased slightly. Compared with the control (CK), the soil bulk density decreased by 5. 9%~9.3%, the non-capillary porosity and total porosity respectively increased by 1.2%~12.4% and 4.0%~7.5%. The maximum water holding capacity of soil increased by 4.7%~6.2%. In conclusion, the effects of Chinese herbal medicine under Chinese fir forest on the litter reserves and its water conservation capacity were significantly negative, while the effects on the soil water conservation capacity were positive but not significant. and positioning monitoring on a longer time scale was needed.

     

/

返回文章
返回